🏷️

CBLE teaching domain

Marking & Origin

Determine origin, the ultimate purchaser, marking method, exceptions, and additional duties.

Study unit 1About 9 minutes

Select the correct marking-origin rule

Ability objective

Choose between the general country-of-origin rule and the Part 102 marking rules before analyzing the result.

Core rule

For ordinary marking analysis, country of origin is the country of manufacture, production, or growth; work performed in another country changes that origin only if it effects a substantial transformation. For a good whose marking origin is Canada, Mexico, or the United States, Part 102 determines country of origin for marking purposes. The shipping or export country is not automatically the marking origin. This is the current-law baseline reviewed on 2026-08-18; for a CBLE question, confirm the CFR and other references designated for that exam sitting before choosing the exam answer.

Authority and lookup route

Reference lookup task

Find the sentence in §134.1(b) that sends Canada, Mexico, and United States marking-origin questions to Part 102.

Route: Read §134.1(b), then confirm the defined terms in §134.1(g) and (j) before opening Part 102.

Worked example

A product is shipped from Mexico, but its components and processing span several countries. May the examiner select Mexico as the marking origin solely because Mexico is the export country?

  1. 1Separate country of export from country of origin.
  2. 2Recognize the possible Canada-Mexico-United States marking branch in §134.1.
  3. 3Apply the Part 102 hierarchy to the component and processing facts.
  4. 4Choose an origin only after that legal analysis, not from the shipping route alone.

Conclusion: No. Mexico's role as the export country is not enough; the marking origin must be determined under the applicable Part 102 rules.

Common traps

  • ×Equating the country of export or last shipment with country of origin.
  • ×Applying only the general substantial-transformation test to a Canada or Mexico marking question.
  • ×Using a preferential-tariff origin conclusion as the marking-origin answer without checking the marking rule.
Authority checked: 2026-08-18
Study unit 2About 10 minutes

Test substantial transformation

Ability objective

Use the regulatory name-character-use framework without treating every U.S. process as origin-changing.

Core rule

For an article outside the Part 102 marking branch, further work changes country of origin only when it effects a substantial transformation. Under §134.35, U.S. manufacture producing an article with a name, character, or use different from the imported article makes the U.S. manufacturer or processor the ultimate purchaser; the imported article may be excepted from individual marking, but its outermost container remains subject to marking. Whether a real process satisfies the test is fact-specific and may require CBP rulings or case law. This is the current-law baseline reviewed on 2026-08-18; for a CBLE question, confirm the CFR and other references designated for that exam sitting before choosing the exam answer.

Authority and lookup route

Reference lookup task

Find the name-character-use language in §134.35 and the separate sentence that preserves outermost-container marking.

Route: Read §134.35(a) in two passes: first for the transformation test, then for the consequence for the article and its outermost container.

Worked example

Non-Canada/Mexico metal blanks are imported and processed in the United States. The facts expressly establish that the process creates finished gears with a different name, character, or use. Who is the ultimate purchaser of the imported blanks, and what marking remains?

  1. 1Confirm that the ordinary §134.35 branch, not Part 102, applies.
  2. 2Match the stipulated different name, character, or use to the substantial-transformation rule.
  3. 3Treat the U.S. manufacturer or processor as the ultimate purchaser of the blanks.
  4. 4Except the blanks from individual marking while marking their outermost containers as required.

Conclusion: The U.S. manufacturer is the ultimate purchaser; the imported blanks may be excepted from individual marking, but their outermost containers must be marked.

Common traps

  • ×Assuming any assembly, finishing, or repacking in the United States is a substantial transformation.
  • ×Finding a transformation and then forgetting the outermost-container requirement.
  • ×Turning one fact-specific example into a universal rule for the same product name.
Authority checked: 2026-08-18
Study unit 3About 9 minutes

Identify the ultimate purchaser

Ability objective

Identify the person who must receive origin information by following the imported article to its last U.S. recipient in imported form.

Core rule

The ultimate purchaser is generally the last U.S. person to receive the article in the form in which it was imported. A retail purchaser is the ultimate purchaser when the article is sold unchanged; a U.S. manufacturer may be the ultimate purchaser after a qualifying substantial transformation; minor processing that leaves the imported article's identity intact generally leaves the later consumer or user as ultimate purchaser. Part 102 supplies the corresponding branch for Canada, Mexico, and United States marking goods. This is the current-law baseline reviewed on 2026-08-18; for a CBLE question, confirm the CFR and other references designated for that exam sitting before choosing the exam answer.

Authority and lookup route

Reference lookup task

Find the three §134.1(d) examples for manufacture, minor processing, and retail sale in imported form, then state who is the ultimate purchaser in each.

Route: Read §134.1(d)(1) through (3) in sequence and make the imported form, processing result, and recipient explicit.

Worked example

Imported kitchen timers are placed into new retail cartons in the United States without changing the timers themselves and are sold to consumers. Who is the ultimate purchaser of each timer?

  1. 1Follow the timer, not merely the carton, through the U.S. transaction.
  2. 2Recognize that repacking does not change the timer's imported identity.
  3. 3Apply §134.1(d)(2)-(3) rather than the manufacturing example.
  4. 4Identify the retail consumer as the last U.S. recipient of the timer in imported form.

Conclusion: The retail consumer is the ultimate purchaser of the timer.

Common traps

  • ×Automatically naming the importer as ultimate purchaser.
  • ×Treating repacking or a minor process as a substantial transformation.
  • ×Tracking the retail container while losing sight of the imported article whose origin must be communicated.
Authority checked: 2026-08-18
Study unit 4About 10 minutes

Apply article and container marking exceptions

Ability objective

Determine whether an article is excepted from individual marking and independently test the container requirement.

Core rule

Section 134.32 exceptions generally remove the article-marking requirement, not every container requirement. Unless the container is also excepted, the outermost container in which the article ordinarily reaches the ultimate purchaser must indicate the article's origin. The §134.33 J-list covers listed classes, not every small, bulk, or low-value article. Other agencies' independent marking or labeling requirements remain applicable. This is the current-law baseline reviewed on 2026-08-18; for a CBLE question, confirm the CFR and other references designated for that exam sitting before choosing the exam answer.

Authority and lookup route

Reference lookup task

For §134.32(d), (f), (g), and (h), decide separately whether the article and its usual or outermost container must be marked.

Route: Read the selected exception in §134.32, then return to §134.22 and the statutory container rule in 19 U.S.C. 1304(b).

Worked example

Imported wire is expressly listed in §134.33 and is sold in a sealed box that ordinarily reaches the ultimate purchaser unopened. The wire is unmarked, but the box clearly states the wire's country of origin. Is the stated marking arrangement consistent with Part 134?

  1. 1Verify that the article itself is a listed J-list article under §134.33.
  2. 2Treat the article exception separately from the container rule.
  3. 3Identify the sealed box as the outermost container ordinarily reaching the ultimate purchaser.
  4. 4Confirm that the box communicates the wire's origin to that purchaser.

Conclusion: Yes, on the stated facts: the listed article may be excepted from individual marking while the outermost container identifies the article's origin.

Common traps

  • ×Treating an article exception as an automatic container exception.
  • ×Using the J-list for an article that is merely small or difficult to mark but not actually listed.
  • ×Marking only the container's own origin while failing to identify the origin of its contents.
  • ×Assuming a Part 134 exception overrides an independent FDA, FTC, or other agency requirement.
Authority checked: 2026-08-18
Study unit 5About 11 minutes

Correct marking and calculate enforcement consequences

Ability objective

Apply repacking, correction, redelivery, liquidated-damages, and 10-percent additional-duty rules in the correct sequence.

Core rule

Repacking may not obscure an article's origin mark unless the new container is properly marked, and an importer may have certification or written notice duties when it or a later purchaser repacks. An article not legally marked at importation is subject to an additional duty of 10 percent of final appraised value unless, before liquidation and under customs supervision, it is properly marked, exported, or destroyed. A released article may also be subject to redelivery and bond liquidated damages. Current 19 U.S.C. 1304 places the 10-percent rule in subsection (i); some current Part 134 text retains older subsection references, so distinguish current statute from the CFR edition designated for the exam. This is the current-law baseline reviewed on 2026-08-18; for a CBLE question, confirm the CFR and other references designated for that exam sitting before choosing the exam answer.

Authority and lookup route

Reference lookup task

Find the three supervised actions that can avoid the 10-percent duty before liquidation, then distinguish CBP's deadline to demand redelivery from the importer's response period after notice.

Route: Read 19 U.S.C. 1304(i) first, then compare §134.3(b) with §134.54(a); use §§134.25-134.26 if the facts include repacking.

Worked example

Parts marked 'Made in Malaysia' are placed after release into opaque blister packs that completely hide the article marks. The new packs show no origin. What must the importer do, and what consequence may remain if the defect is not cured under customs supervision before liquidation?

  1. 1Apply §134.26 because post-release retail repacking obscures the article marking.
  2. 2Keep the article marking visible or mark the new container with Malaysia and satisfy the applicable certification or downstream notice duty.
  3. 3If CBP issues a marking or redelivery notice, follow the correction, supervision, and response rules in §§134.51-134.54.
  4. 4If no qualifying supervised marking, exportation, or destruction occurs before liquidation, apply the 10-percent duty to final appraised value.

Conclusion: The importer must preserve or replace the origin communication on the retail package and comply with the applicable repacking and correction procedures; otherwise the 10-percent marking duty may be assessed on final appraised value, with separate redelivery or bond consequences also possible.

Common traps

  • ×Calculating the 10-percent marking duty from entered value instead of final appraised value.
  • ×Assuming an article free of ordinary duty cannot incur the separate marking duty.
  • ×Treating unsupervised post-import marking as automatically sufficient to avoid the duty before liquidation.
  • ×Using a stale CFR subsection cross-reference as though it changed the current statutory placement of 19 U.S.C. 1304(i).
Authority checked: 2026-08-18